capital punishment- essey

Proszę o wskazanie błędów. Capital punishment is never justified. What is your opinion ?

Capital punishment is the hardest decision making by the court. Nowadays, most countries banned the death penalty, however there is a small number of countries, where this penalty still exist. In my point of view, I entirely agree with the statement that the capital punishment is never justified.
First of all, the capital punishment breaks the basic human right, which is the right to live. I think that even in extreme cases, when a human kills with premeditation other human, nobody has no law to make a decision about the culprit's death. It seems to me that each person, who has committed the crime should receive a chance to think about your guilt and changes your life.
On the other hand, I fully understand victim's family point of view. We have to imagine that in case, when a person close to us suffers from pain and in consequence died, we cannot justify the culprit's behavior. It is our human behavior is that we demand the justice, we are firmly convinced that the offender is forced to bear the harshest consequences, even if he or she might be condemned for the death penalty.
Taking everything into consideration, I am convinced that the capital punishment should never be justified, because it breaks the most important human right to live. Nevertheless, I understand the opposite view that the victim's family has undoubtedly right to the equitable judgment.

W tytule wkradł się błąd powinno być "essay"

Czy moge prosic o sprawdzenie mojej pracy ?

Capital punishment is the hardest decision 'making' (tutaj masz zle, powinno byc 'made' ) by the court. Nowadays, most countries HAVE banned the death penalty, however there is a small number of countries, where this penalty still 'exist' (tutaj jest 3os.l.poj - penalty -it- existS) . In my point of view, I entirely agree with the statement that 'the' (niepotr) capital punishment is never justified.
First of all, 'the' (niepotr) capital punishment breaks the basic human right, which is the right to 'live' (nie wiem, czy tutaj masz na mysli 'life-zycie' czy 'live-zyc' - mowimy chyba o 'life'). I think that even in extreme cases, when a human kills with premeditation other human, 'nobody has no law' (to jest zle - chyba masz na mysli...'there is no law allowing anybody') to make a decision about the 'culprit's' (to jest troche za lagodne slowo, jak chodzi o murderer) death. It seems to me that each person(,) (niepotrzeba przecinka) who has committed the crime (ale jaki? musisz napisac, czy masz po prostu na mysli 'committed murder') should receive a chance to think about 'your' (nie, bo tutaj piszesz o 'person' to musisz miec 'their') guilt and changes TO 'your' (nie mozesz odzywac sie do mnie tutaj jako 'you, bo tak nie robisz, piszesz o kims tam, to musi byc 'their') life.
On the other hand, I fully understand (przedimek) victim's family point of view. We have to imagine that in (przedimek) case, when a person close to us suffers from pain and in consequence 'died' (zly czas, tutaj 'dies'), we cannot justify the 'culprit's' (poprzaw, culprit-to wiecej osoba ktora ukradnie cos tam) behavior. It is our human behavior 'is' (nie wiem co to slowo tutaj robi) that we demand 'the' (niepotr) justice, we are firmly convinced that the offender 'is' (trzeba troche stanowczo np 'should/must be') forced to bear the harshest consequences, even if he or she might be condemned 'for' (zle slowo, tutaj 'to') the death penalty.
Taking everything into consideration, I am convinced that 'the' (niepotr) capital punishment should never be justified, because it breaks the most important human right to 'live' (jak wyzej). Nevertheless, I understand the opposite view that the victim's family has undoubtedly (przedimek) right to 'the' (niepotr) equitable judgment.

Zrob cos z tymi przedimkami (a, an, the) bo sie mylisz kiedy je trzeba uzywac.

Dziekuje bardzo