>>ze byla to sytuacja zmieniajaca sie na przestrzeni czasu az do lat 20 i prawdopodobnie beyond that time)
..and maybe this is exactly why we should rather use the past perfect progressive here, don't you think?
Look, you give some background infortmation in the past for something that had been going on up until it turned out the way it did before another point in the past (and probably even continued up beyond that point ) - it became this and that as a result of that happening, right. I think we can agree on that.
This isn't exactly the temporal frame of habitual progressive in the past that can be implied here, but again, rather the iterartive sense of this 'pluperfect progressive', like a temporary habit up to some point in the past .
I might be wrong though, it's only one man's opinion.
edytowany przez savagerhino: 10 sie 2013