Prosilbym o sprawdzenie tekstu

Temat przeniesiony do archwium.
Witam, napisalem tekst tak od czapy i chcialbym zeby ktos go sprawdzil. Specjalnie napisalem tak na szybkiego, wiec jest pewnie sporo bledow. Musze sie wziasc za pisanie po angielsku bo z tym u mnie jest bidnie :)

Is Daivd Moyes adequate for MAn Utd manager job? About a half year
ago Sir Alex Ferguson decided to retire from coaching. He had every right to
do so considering his age (any day now 70). He won the leage with a prevelance of 20 points. He had the same squad as Moyes has now, yet his team is in the medium of the leage table at the moment, struggling for qualifying to "the final four". One can say that Moyes is a weak coach and once he is gone The Devils will begin to succeed. But is it really true? Every team has its ebb and flow. Looking back at other great teams we can see that reign can't last forever. Barcelona had exceled for almost 5 years from 2006 to 2011 but we all remember what happened in the clash with Bayern. What is more, Barcelona has probably the best single players in the world, but it is unlikely
that will be able to dominate in CL. In "normal" life, outside "the football celebrieties' bubble" there is something called "Burn out", and it doesn't apply to the ordinary jobs like lawyer or nurse only. This can often happens to footballers especially when they are at the top for some time. If this is what refrains Man Utd from winning? Granted, they have some old player that won everything they could, but not all are covered in gold. A few younger players should have driven this team, but they haven't.
It was generally believed that youngsters would have an much bigger impact on playing style. As it turned out, it was a fancy. Wheater they are weak footballers or just lazy with training Moyes ought to refresh his team, and this is what he is trying to do recently. Signing Mata was a jolly great move. Man Utd has needed a playmaker of
his quality. However, one superb player won't salavage Moyes' team. The main "11" still needs some reinforcement on the key positions. Two good defenders and at least one more winger are requisite. Let's just hope that the new Manager knows what he is doing. His last moves showed that he realized what task he has to face with.
Is Daivd Moyes adequate for MAn Utd manager job?
About 'a half year' (lepiej 6 months) ago Sir Alex Ferguson decided to retire from 'coaching' (no nie, on byl managerem, to wiecej jak coach). He had every right to do so considering his age (any day now (zapomniales dodac...on bedzie mial) 70). He won the 'leage' (duza litera i blad ortog) with a prevelance of 20 points. He had the same squad as Moyes has now, yet 'his' (nie wiadomo o kim mowa, o Alex czy David) team is in the 'medium' (zle slowo) of the leage table at the moment, struggling for 'qualifying' (zla czesc mowy - tu lepiej rzeczownik) to "the final four".
'Bt' (ortog) is 'it' (nie, daj slowo 'this') really true?
Looking back at other great teams we can see that (tutaj brak slowa) reign can't last forever. Barcelona had 'exceled' (ortog) for almost 5 years from 2006 to 2011 but we all remember what happened in the clash with Bayern.
In "normal" life, outside "the football celebrieties' bubble" there is something called "Burn out", and it doesn't apply to the ordinary jobs like (brak 2 slowa) lawyer or nurse only. This can often 'happens' (zle slowo) to footballers especially when they are at the top for some time. If this is what 'refrains' (zle slowo) Man Utd from winning? Granted, they have some old 'player' (tylko jednego? tutaj ma byc l. mn) that won everything they could, but not all are covered in gold.
It was generally believed that youngsters would have 'an' (zly przedimek, dlaczego dales 'an'?) much bigger impact on (brak przedimka) playing style. As it turned out, 'it' (ja bym tu dala 'this') was a fancy. 'Wheater' (ortog) they are weak footballers or just lazy with training Moyes ought to refresh his team, and this is what he is trying to do recently.
Man Utd has needed a 'playmaker' (lepiej 'player') of his quality. However, one superb player won't 'salavage' (ortog) Moyes' team. The main "11" still needs some reinforcement 'on' (zle slowo, tutaj IN) the key positions. Two good defenders and at least one more winger are 'requisite' (zle slowo). His last moves showed that he realized what task he has to face. 'with' (niepotr)
Wielkie dzieki za wnikliwa analize :). A w zwiazku z tym mam takie pytania

1. Czy tam gdzie jest napisane " struggling for qualifying" nie moze byc formy present continous slowa "qualify" czy obleci i taka forma?

2. jakie slowo powinno byc zamiast "happens"?

3. Jakie slowo powinno byc zamiast "refrain"?

3. Jak to jest z tym "requisite", bo specjalnie dalem tu to slowo poniewaz pamietalem ze oznacza " wymagany,konieczny" wiec czemu tu nie pasuje? Nie uzywa sie go w mowie potocznej czy jak?

>>>>2. jakie slowo powinno byc zamiast "happens"?
3. Jakie slowo powinno byc zamiast "refrain"?<<<<<
Imo, jedno z nich możesz zostawic ale zmień form. burn out bym połączył i only /w tym samym zdaniu/, nie dał na koniec zdania;)