Nowadays more and more schools
are deciding(raczej present simple) to give up
with(bez tego) PE classes based on competitive games. Instead, they provide exercises
in which there is(niezgrabne może angielskir słowo "bez") no winners and losers. What are the benefits and drawbacks of
such a s (może angielskie słowo "tego")step?
There is no denying that there are numerous marvelous reasons for
such a(znowu moze "takiego") solution. First of all, there are no arguments between students. It prevents children from bursting into tears and provides a peaceful lesson. Secondly, there is
an (niepoliczalne) equality among students. Some of them may do badly in nsport and
(brakuje słowa dwie litery na b) seeing that they lose another game (brakuje zaimka aby zrobic relative clause) can reduce their self-assesment.
Nevertheless, there are also disadvantages of such a solution. Firstly, competitive games help children to adapt to life. Not only do they teach them
the(niepotrzebne) humility, but also show how to cope with the
occured (moze przym. od "exist)problems. What is more, such games motivate children to
work.(prosi się o słowo "mocniej). Seeing that their opponent is better, they will make more effort
s (raczej chodzi o ogólny wysiłek)to beat them, which
affects(moze poprostu "ma pozytywny efekt)
positively on their personal development.
In conclusion, there are both pros and cons of doing away with PE lessons based on competitiveness. Taking into consideration all the aforementioned arguments, I am inclined to agree with the opponents
more.(po czasowniku osobowym) However, every PE teacher should make (zaimek jego/ich)
an own choice depending on the abilities of
the(raczej ogólnie) students.