Bardzo gorąco prosze o sprawdzenie z góry THX

The first printed newspaper was published in 1605, and the form has thrived even in the face of competition from technologies such as radio, television, and the internet. which were invented in first part of nineteenth century. I think that information media have never been objective and unbiased and it never will be.
Everyday we are faced a lot of newspaper. Man on the street aren’t aware that majority of paper don’t tell us all truth. Moreover they are used by political party to order body politic. I’m afraid about Poland because pole havn’t got any good newspapers apart Newsweek which report to thrity park. They are as determined as is possible and they buy rag such as fakt and super express which are the most popular papers in my country. Furthermore even sport column in Gazeta Wyborcza is subjective and editor prefers Cravovia then Wisła .
Only Antyradio seems me neutral, may I thik so because I love rock rege and ska music. Only anty radio’s journalists tell us naked truth.
Nowadays there are plenty of TV station . I know no objective television. In Poland is normal that if one give money to station, one want to decide what is transmited.
To sum up if mentality’s pole don’t turn around, we won’t have neutral media. In my opinion generation who know communism have to die.

A propo sprawdzani to jeszcze taki jest temat "Objective and unbiased* information media ( newspapers, radio,TV ) do not exist. Do You agree or disagree with this view? Why? " z góry dziękuje za pomoc

The first printed newspaper was published in 1605, and the form has thrived (moze lepiej: HAS BEEN THRIVING) even in the face of competition from technologies such as radio, television, and the internet which were invented in first part of nineteenth century. (THE 20th century ;-)) the first HALF

I think that THE information media have never been objective and unbiased and it (THEY) never will be.
Everyday we are faced WITH a lot of newspaperS.

Man on the street (moze lepiej: ordinary people?) aren't aware that THE majority of paperS don't tell us all (lepiej: THE WHOLE) truth. Moreover (, pamietaj o przecinkach po linking words) they are used by political party (partIES) to order body politic (co masz na mysli???).

I'm afraid (lepiej: WORRIED) about Poland because pole (THE POLES) havn't (spelling) got any good newspapers apart (brakuje FROM) Newsweek which report (relative clauses: "...Newsweek, which report" albo "Newsweek which reportS") to thrity park.(co masz na mysli?)
They are as determined as is possible and they buy rag such as fakt and super express (capital letters) which are the most popular papers in my country. Furthermore (przecinek!) even THE sportS column in Gazeta Wyborcza is subjective and THE editor prefers Cravovia then Wisła (wyjasnij, ze to kluby pilkarskie).
Only Antyradio seems TO BE neutral, may(BE???/ PERHAPS) I thik (spelling)so because I love rock rege (spelling) and ska music. Only anty radio's journalists tell us (THE) naked truth.
Nowadays there are plenty of TV station (liczba mnoga) . I know no objective television. In Poland (IT) is normal that if one give(S) money to A station, one want(S) to decide what is transmited.(spelling; lepiej: broadcast)
To sum up (przecinek!) if mentality's pole (mentalnosci Polak? the Polish mentality) don't (Gr; Does not) turn around (lepiej: change), we won't have neutral media. In my opinion (przecinek) THE generation who know communism have to die. (moze lepiej: die out?)

Dziękuje za pomoc



Moreover, they are used by political party (partIES) to order body politic (tutaj mam na myśli iż polityczne partie za pomocą mediów sterują społeczeństwem).

w takim razie mozna napisac : to manipulate the public

dzięki