pomoc w transformacjach

mogłabym prosić o pomoc w tych transformacjach?


1. I've changed my mind about buying a new bag because I don't have enough money. (afford)
I .......... a new bag so I've changed my mind.

2. We don't have any pets because my dad doesn't like animals.(would)
If my dad ......... some pets. (moja prop: like animals, we would have)

3. I might not be in later, so tke your keys with you. (case)
Take your keys with you ........ in later. (in case of be??)

4. The motor will only start if you press this button. (unless)
The motor....... you press this button. (won't start, unless)

5. MrsW. advised her sister to complain. (if)
'I ......... you,' Mrs W. said to her sister. (would complain if I were you)

6. I'll tell you my secret, but only if you don't tell anyone else. (as)
I'll tell you my secret ........... you don't tell anyone else. (as long as)

7. The government have produced some suprising figures on crime. (come)
The government have .......... some surprising figures on crime. (???)

8. I wish you would pay more attenion when I'm talking to you. (notice)
I wish you would ........ when I'm talking to you.

9. How much did you lend to J. yesterday? (borrow)
How much did ......... yesterday? (J. borrowed from you)

10. Can you get some more coffee because there isn't much left? (only)
Can you get some more coffee because there ........ left?


dzięki bardzo za wszelkie sugestie

Witaj,

Co do zdań 2, 4, 5, 6 i 9 zgadzam się z Twoimi odpowiedziami, możesz je śmiało wpisać:)

Pozostałe zdania:
1. I've changed my mind about buying a new bag because I don't have
>enough money. (afford)
>I CAN'T AFFORD a new bag so I've changed my mind.

>3. I might not be in later, so tke your keys with you. (case)
>Take your keys with you IN CASE I'M NOT in later. (uważaj, po prepositions, np. of, dajemy prawie zawsze Gerund (czyli -ing) albo zdanie podrzedne, tak jak powyzej)

>7. The government have produced some suprising figures on crime.
>(come)
>The government have COME THROUGH WITH some surprising figures on crime. (Nie mam 100% pewności, ale to jedyny synonim "produce" z "come", jaki mi przychodzi do głowy)

>8. I wish you would pay more attenion when I'm talking to you.
>(notice)
>I wish you would TAKE MORE NOTICE when I'm talking to you.

>10. Can you get some more coffee because there isn't much left?
>(only)
>Can you get some more coffee because there IS ONLY A LITTLE left?
(może da się jakoś inteligentniej, ale wydaje mi się, że tak będzie ok)

Mogę spytać, z jakiego poziomu te pytania? Jakiś kurs na CAE, FCE czy jeszcze inaczej?:)

Pozdrawiam:)

poziom FCE...
co do 7 to może come out with...?

>1. I've changed my mind about buying a new bag because I don't have
>enough money. (afford)
>I {can't AFFORD to buy} a new bag so I've changed my mind.

>2. We don't have any pets because my dad doesn't like animals.(would)
>If my dad {liked animals, we WOULD have} some pets.

>3. I might not be in later, so tke your keys with you. (case)
>Take your keys with you {in CASE I am not} in later.

4. OK
5. OK
6. OK

>7. The government have produced some suprising figures on crime.
>(come)
>The government have {COME out with} some surprising figures on crime.

>8. I wish you would pay more attenion when I'm talking to you.
>(notice)
>I wish you would {take more NOTICE} when I'm talking to you.

>9. How much did you lend to J. yesterday? (borrow)
>How much did {J. BORROW from you} yesterday?

>10. Can you get some more coffee because there isn't much left?
>(only)
>Can you get some more coffee because there {is ONLY a little} left?

witaj ponownie,

tak, w 7. come out with bedzie chyba najodpowiedniejsze.

Co do propozycji Engee30, to pierwsza jest ok, ale moim skromnym zdaniem nie potrzeba dodawac to buy, bo to oczywiste, a im krocej, tym lepiej.

Pozdrawiam:)

>Co do propozycji Engee30, to pierwsza jest ok, ale moim skromnym
>zdaniem nie potrzeba dodawac to buy, bo to oczywiste, a im krocej, tym
>lepiej.

obawiam sie, ze musz sie sprzeciwic twojemu pogladowi, jakoby 'im krocej, tym lepiej' - to sa transformacje, tu nalezy stosowac wszystko, co jest mozliwe do zastosowania ze zdania wyjsciowego; w 1 zdaniu wyjsciowym bylo 'into buying', a wiec nalezaloby ten sam czasownik zastosowac w przeksztalconym zdaniu, tak ja ja to zrobilem

dzięki bardzo wsyztkim za pomoc

a w 10. nie powinno byc ...is ONLY LITTLE left? tzn. BEZ "a"?

i jak sie mowi o 'government' to zawsze jako o ogole ludzi tam pracujacych -> formy czasownikow charakterystyczny dla liczby mnogiej? ('have' vs. 'has')

Właśnie engee? Nie powinno byc "little" (mało) zamiast "a little" (trochę)? Czy moze to wszystko jedno w tym przypadku?

Właśnie engee? Nie powinno byc "little" (mało) zamiast "a little" (trochę)? Czy moze to wszystko jedno w tym przypadku?

7. imho came up with.

a może jednak nie :)) nvm.

>Właśnie engee? Nie powinno byc "little" (mało) zamiast "a little"
>(trochę)?

'only few' czy 'only little' jest uwazane za niekompletne wyrazenie, tym samym jest niepoprawne

>'only few' czy 'only little' jest uwazane za niekompletne wyrazenie,
>tym samym jest niepoprawne

jestes pewny? any reliable source?

the only person that I really trust is my friend, a Canadian English teacher; take it for granted that it is correct - I'm certain she wouldn't have lied to me; I'm sure you've come across many an example of such use, but the fact you've seen those phrases doesn't mean they are correct