In principle you're right, but despite what dictionaries say:
http://www.bartelby.com/64/C003/0264.html
the use of "a series of" with a plural verb is quite frequent. Google gives 179,000 hits for "there was a series of" and 163,000 for "there were a series of".
I even found some debates on that topic:
http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?t=493859
http://forum.wordreference.com/showthread.php?t=524325
It seems that "a series of" has recently become (or is gradually becoming) a set expression that can be used just as "a lot of".
To sum up, I think that in the original sequence 'is' fits better than 'are', but I'd accept 'are' (with a slight change of meaning).