Prosze o sprawdzenie;)

Temat przeniesiony do archwium.
In the last few years there were some protest against the establishing or expansion of national parks. In what way can national parks be controversial?


Nowadays there are many doubts if creating national parks is nessesery conseguently there was a few protest against the establishing or expansion of national parks. It became a controversial topic because it has a lot of opponents as well as believer.
Firstly national parks are expensive undertaking because a lot of people have to work to protect this areas from devastation. What is more they are visited by many tourist tah is the reason why there are needed wardens who have to supervise order. Moreover those places where national parks are created can be reserved for other purposes for example to build factories, offices where people can work or flats wchich they live inor motorway that is why creating national parks can be treated like waste of precious ground. Besides a lot of people who live in neighbourhood of national parks are opposed to them. They can't establish any industrial plants and farmers who live on the boundary of national parks complain about animals that destroy their crops.
On the other hand such undertaking help us to save some endangered species all plants are protected and given good conditions in wchich to grow. It can not be denided that there special care is taken to keep the water clean so taht the fauna and flora of the springs and lakes can be saved. A national parks is an area left in its natural state and ekological balance of natuaral ahbitat is preserved.
To sum up increasing national parks or creating new ones is a controversial problem and (żeby pogodzić obydwie strony) they should be cerated but maby not too many.
Nowadays there are many doubts if creating national parks is 'nessesery' (ortog)
conseguently there wERE a few protestS against the establishing..
It became a controversial topic because it has a lot of opponents as well as A LOT OF believerS.
Firstly national parks are AN expensive undertaking because a lot of
people have to work to protect 'this' (this to l. poj a 'areas' to l.mnoga- prosze popraw) areas from devastation. What is more they are visited by many tourist AND THAT is the reason why 'there are needed wardens' (zla kol slow ....wardens are needed there) who have to supervise order. Moreover those places where national parks are created can be reserved for other purposes
for example to build factories, offices where people can work or flats
'wchich' (ortog) they live in or motorway. That is why creating national parks can be treated like A waste of precious ground. Besides a lot of people who
live in THE neighbourhood of national parks are opposed to them.

On the other hand such undertaking helpS us to save some endangered
species. All plants are protected and given good conditions in 'wchich' (ortog)
to grow. It can not be denided that 'there' (niepotr) special care is taken to
keep the water clean so 'taht' THAT the fauna and flora of the springs and
lakes can be saved. A national parK is an area left in its natural
state and eCological balance of 'natuaral' (ortog) 'ahbitat' (ortog) is preserved.
To sum up increasing national parks or creating new ones is a
controversial problem and (in order to satisfy both sides) they should
be 'cerated' (ortog) but maYby not too many.

« 

Studia za granicą

 »

English only


Zostaw uwagę