Present Simple Past Simple passive-Sprawdzenie

1. Vitamin C was discovered in 1747.
2. Toothbrushes was invented by the Chinese.
3. The people aren't taken to hospital after the accident.
4. A new medical centre is opened in my town last year.
5. A lot of remedies were made from plants.
6. I wasn't given any medicine at the hospital.
7. My teeth is checked twice a year.
8. Vaccinations aren't developed until the 18th century.
9. I called for an ambulance but it isn't needed.

>1. Vitamin C was discovered in 1747. OK
>2. Toothbrushes {were} invented by the Chinese.
>3. The people aren't taken to hospital after the accident. OK
>4. A new medical centre {was} opened in my town last year.
>5. A lot of remedies were made from plants. OK
>6. I wasn't given any medicine at the hospital. OK
>7. My teeth {are} checked twice a year.
>8. Vaccinations {weren't} developed until the 18th century.
>9. I called for an ambulance but it {wasn't} needed.

uuuu.. ;))
Dziękuję Ci :**

>3. The people aren't taken to hospital after the accident.

to nie ma sensu w czasie teraźniejszym
konkretnych ludzi nie bierze sie do szpitala po konkretnym wypadku

To musi byc w czasie przeszlym

...We want you to imagine a situation where there are a few people involved in a motorway accident. The people aren't taken to hospital after the accident. What would you think of such a situation?...

wszystko ma sens w odpowiednim osadzeniu czasowym i sytuacyjnym :|

ale tu nie ma kontekstu, a pytający zrobił kilka błędów w wyborze czasu

no dobrze, ale nie mozna zaraz od razu mowic, ze cos jest bez sensu :(

Nie musi, chociaż faktycznie zabrzmi lepiej.
Mnie bardziej zgrzytnęło piąte - IMHO bardziej tam pasuje are, a nie were:)