ROZPRAWKA

Temat przeniesiony do archwium.
Proszę o sprawdzenie :)

Przeprowadzanie testów na zwierzętach powowinno być surowo zabronione( rozprawka za i przeciw )

Experimentation on animals should be severely forbidden.
Nowadays scientists do a lot o experiments and researches. The invites high- technology creams, ointment, medicaments and other things which make our life better and more healthy. But have you ever thought what happen in laboratories ? Have you considered how scientists know that their inventions are not harmful for people ? Sometimes they use animals for tests. But is it right ?
Firstly activity on animals is very danger for them. If something go wrong, animals can be injured or they can die. Moreover they are closed in cages.They are threatened only like a guinea pig. Animals have not enough attention, playing ,they have only food.They have not relationship with people. They do not live in their natural habitat , the have not contact with oder animals.If they ever be free, they will not know how to survive out of laboratory.
On the oder hand animals could save our life. Scientists tasted at animals a lot of medicaments , for example for cancer, HIV. Also they do at animals surgeons , for example transplantation. This kind of activity develop doctors qualifications. Furthermore animals live in good conditions. They do not have to worry about food and survival. In cages they are safe.
To sum up, scientific researches on animals are not good, but it could help us to heal a lot of people. Fortunately is is less spread because science is becoming more and more inoffensive. In laboratories are used machines and computers and there is no need to use animals.
poprawie sama siebie :D If something GOES ...
Nowadays scientists do a lot 'o' (ortog) experiments and researches. 'The' (ortog) 'invites' (zle slowo) high-technology creams, ointmentS (l. mnoga), 'medicaments' (zle slowo) and other things which make our life better and more healthIER. But have you ever thought what happenS in laboratories?
Firstly activity on animals is very 'danger' (zla czesc zdania) for them. If something goES wrong, animals can be injured or they can die.
They are threatened only like 'a' (niepotr) guinea pigS. Animals
'have not' (napisz to gram - DO NOT HAVE enough attention, 'playing' (nie rozumiem co to slowo tutaj robi? niby z kim oni 'playing'),they have only food.They DO NOT have 'not' ANY relationship with people. They do not live in their natural habitat , theY DO NOT have 'not' ANY contact with 'oder' (ortog) animals.If they 'ever be' ARE EVER free, they will not know how to survive out of THE laboratory.
On the 'oder' (co tu z tym niemieckim?) hand animals could save our life. Scientists 'tasted' (zle slowo- znaczy calkowicie cos innego) 'at' (niepotr) animals a lot of 'medicaments' (zle slowo), for example for cancer OR HIV. Also they 'do at animals surgeons' (pomysl o tym, surgeons-to lekarze ktorzy wykonuja SURGERIES), for example transplantation. This kind of activity developS (it-developS) doctors qualifications.
To sum up, scientific researches on animals are not good, but 'it' (THEY (dlatego ze researches to l. mn) could help us to heal 'a lot of' (napisz numerous) people. Fortunately 'is is less spread' (tego nie rozumiem) because science is becoming more and more inoffensive. In laboratories 'are used machines' (napisz to inaczej...machines as well as ...computers ARE USED SO there is no need to use animals.
dzięki :)