Eutanazja rozprawka prosba o sprawdzenie

Euthanasia is a very controversial problem. Arguments are divided between two groups: some people support the euthanasia, the others think it is wrong. In Holland euthanasia is legal and the idea has many followers in Poland too. In my essay i’ll try to describe this problem.

There are peoples who don’t have chance to live without special machinery.As the result they can only wait for death with enormous pain. Euthanasia is the way to relieve the terminally ill patients of suffering and cut their waiting. Secondy, people have a right to decide when they want die and nobody can’t affect to their decisions.What’s more costs of treatment,special machinery and medicine are very high .This is very brutal side of this problem but many governments of europeans nations says they don’t have money to keep alive terminally ill patients. So, euthanasia frees up medical funds to help other people.

On the other hand ,the opponents think that everyone is guaranteed to have a natural right to life and euthanasia is injury of god’s law. Furthermore the development of medicine is huge nowadays and it may happen that in a short time some medicines appear which help to treat diseases thought as incurable. There are also some cases when patients who seem to be incurable ill miraculouslny survive. I addition an important aspect of euthanasia is that this procedure is not in tune with medical ethics. Doctors should always try to help people and never to slay them.

It’s very hard to find a solution of this problem beacouse there are as many adventages as disadventages.
In my opinion euthanasia shouldn’t be common in today’s world but in very specific cases it can be done.

Arguments are divided between two groups: some people support 'the' (dlaczego uzyles 'the' tutaj) euthanasia, 'the' (co to z tym 'the' zakochales sie w tym czy cos- popraw) others think (tu cos brakuje) it is wrong.
In my essay 'i'll' (dlaczego piszesz 'i' mala litera? co to?) try to describe this 'problem' (ale o jaki problem chodzi - nic nie wspomniales o problemie) .

There are 'peoples' (popraw, tak nie uzywamy peoples) who don't have (tu cos brakuje) chance to live without special machinery.
Euthanasia is the way to relieve the terminally ill patients of
suffering and 'cut their waiting' (dopisz ostantnie slowo). 'Secondy' (ortog), people have a right to decide when they want (tu cos brakuje) die and nobody 'can't' (zle slowo-popraw) affect 'to' (nie rozumiem dlaczego tu jest 'to') their decisions.
This is (tu cos brakuje) very brutal side of 'this problem' (ALE JAKI problem - tutaj jeszcze nie napisales ze jest jakis problem) but many governments of europeans nations 'says' (many to l. mnoga - dostosuj czasownik) (tu cos brakuje) they don't have (tu cos brakuje) money to keep alive (tu cos brakuje) terminally ill patients.
On the other hand ,the opponents think that everyone 'is' (nie za bardzo trafne slowo-pomysl co chcesz napisac i popraw) guaranteed to have a natural right to life and euthanasia is (tu cos brakuje) injury of God's (duza litera)law. (a co z tymi ktorzy w Boga nie wierza?)
Furthermore the development of medicine is 'huge' (nie za bardzo trafne slowo) nowadays and it may happen that in a short time some medicines (tu cos brakuje) appear which help to treat diseases thought (tu cos brakuje) as incurable. There are also some cases when patients who seem to be 'incurable' (zla czesc zdania) ill 'miraculouslny' (ortog) survive. 'I' (ortog) addition an important aspect of euthanasia is that this procedure is not in tune with medical ethics. Doctors should always try to help people and never to 'slay' (to jest calkowicie zle slowo-popraw) them.
It's very hard to find a solution 'of' TO this problem 'beacouse' (co to jest? bo to nie jest ang slowo-naucz sie tegio na pamiec i napisz poprawnie) there are
as many 'adventages' (ortog) as 'disadventages' (ortog).
In my opinion euthanasia shouldn't be 'common' (nie za bardzo trafne slowo) in today's world but in very specific cases it can be done.