sprawdzenie

mimo ,że jest tam dużo błędów i o tym wiem (ponieważ dowiedziałem się w mym poprzednim temacie) to przynajmnie wskażcie mi je dziękuję :

Devising antibiotics and common vaccinations in half of last century people were thinking that they are safe and they began to win with microbes. But illusion that in that way people will reign on sicknesses were wronged. The next years showed us how mistake we were done. Microbes in arms race began to win. After the second world war emerged the next, very dangerous infections. Particularly a lot of them was in Africa, Asia and South America. The black continent was birthplace of very deadly illnesses. Definitely the most dangerous illness which emerged in Africa were Ebola. His first epidemics noticed in 1976 in Sudan. But 9 years earlier in German city Marburg entirely deadly virus were noticed. 32 people were came down with and 7 of them were died. It turned out that guilty were vervets form Uganda.
From that time virus was appearing and disappearing in surprising rate leaving behind of him a lot of dead people. WHO declared that the virus form Marburg is more dangerous than Ebola because it killed within 1 year about 400 persons. Ebola killed only 100 persons. And the worst things were that 2 viruses were intractable. But now world have a chance. Scientist invented way to neutralize the virus. They want use a “Trojan horse” which is called VSV (pęcherzykowe zapalenie płuc). Scientist let in VSV to the cells of virus and it intercept dominion on him. In order to check action of that method 80 monkeys infected virus Marburg took VSV or nothing. Monkeys which took anything died after 3 days but monkeys which took VSV were living 50 days. Scientist are appealing that discovery probably will be effective not only for virus form Marburg but also for HIV and AIDS.

Gosciu23445e-
znowu ten sam tekst - za malenko cos 'poprawiles'.
Dlaczego przypuszczasz, ze ktos ci caly ten tekst przepisze - napisz choc jedno zdanie poprawnie.

uwagi
...*people were thinking that they are safe (dlaczego 'are'?)
..they began to win with microbes - win what?
*But illusion that in that way people will reign - co to ma znaczyc?
...sicknesses were wronged? co 'were wronged'?
*The next years showed us how mistakes we were done - 'we were done' - co to robi w tym zdaniu?
...*entirely deadly virus were noticed - vius -l.poj to dlaczego 'were'?
..32 people came down with and 7 - 'came down with what?
jest ich duzo, duzo, duzo wiecej -

łatwo ci mówić ponieważ ty widzisz te błędy, które popełniam a ja ich nie zauważam więc prosze nie neguj mnie za to. a tak poza tym te błedy co mi wytykałeś (np. dlaczego tam powinno być are bo po they nie ma is tylko are i tamte inne błędy to była strona bierna przynajmniej tak mi się wydaje)

Ja ciebie nie neguje (jak ty mowisz) ale tylko zwrocilam uwage na niektore bledy. Jak ktos prosi o poprawki, a wtedy nie obraza (nie neguj mnie) - to moze pomocy nie oczekiwales, tylko potwierdzenia, ze wszystko jest o.k.
Prosze formulowac zdania wg gramatyki jez. ang. a nie tlumaczyc je slowo w slowo z jez. polskiego - nie zawsze to wychodzi.

ok po prostu troche sie na siebie zdenerwowalem poniewaz troche sie nad tym meczylem i potem sie okazalo ze wszystko jest na marne

prosze zrozumiec, ze jak ktos Ci zwraca uwage na bledy itp ktore popelniasz, to nie znaczy jakies obznizenie twojej osobistej wartosci jako czlowiek - tylko to sa po prostu bledy w jez. ang.