THIS Master’s thesis consists of two parts - theory and design.
The theme of the theoretical part concerns (mnie sie wydaje ze tou powinno byc 'the') characteristic of revitalization of brownfield sites and socio-historical context and analysis of various examples.
....Particular attention should be paid to the high level of writer's workshop and the ability to use quotations and footnotes....tego nie rozumiem, co to ma do rzeczy.....
. The text clearly shows complex THE process of revitalization. A broad approach to the subject allows (komu? czemu?) to understand the functioning of the industrial city and to show (przedimek) range of opportunities offered by regeneration.
The second part of the Master’s thesis is a project of social revitalization center in Zyrardow. 'Attractive, contemporary and avant-garde building is the way of dialogue with the architecture of the 19th century' (ja bym to zdanie napisala inaczej. bo to brzmi back to front - ). A 'great advantage of the project' (cos tu nie tak) is to intensify the spirit of the place by preserving the original details and historical forms.
The social revitalization center is therefore an excellent example of an unusual coexistence of two architectural 'quality' (popraw...two quali....).
'Priority conservation' (to nie jest zrozumiale...chyba conservation priority) and historical aspect of this dissertation shows (przedimek) author’s interest in protecting (przedimek) cultural heritage. 'Arguments for this fact' (tego nie lubie, cos tu nie tak) are also design decisions in the matter of architecture, urbanism and exhibition of industrial heritage.
(przedimek) thesis becomes an attempt to discuss the revitalization projects realized in Zyrardow
It is important to emphasize (przedimek) outstanding artistic values of the proposed solutions, (przedimek) maturity of technique and (przedimek) independence of the author.