opis osoby - proszę o sprawdzenie. ;)

Amazing people often live nearly us. Julia, my neighbour is the person which I admire. We have been living in our neighbourhood for 10 years. I remember the first time when I met her. I was invited to a housewarming party. I thought that was weird, because strange woman invited me to a party. After party I realised that she was just a nice person who wanted to get to know other people.
Julia is 28 years old. The most noticeable things about her are her beautiful smile and big brown eyes which seems to be very friendly. She is very tall and skinny.
Julia is very helpful. She always helps me and even my friend when we don’t know what to do. She gives good advices to us. We know that she can always listen to us. Julia is also a very reliable person. Once when I went on holiday I couldn’t get my dog with me and then she offered that she was looking after it. She took care of my dog and it seems to liked Julia. She keeps open house so everybody can drop in and spend time with her.
Sum up, the person which I admire lives near to me and spends a lot of time with me. I think I can call Julia my best friend, because I always tell her about everything. She is like a older sister for me and takes care of me.

proszę o sprawdzenie ;)

Amazing people often live nearly (nearly=prawie, nearly to do sth - być blisko zrobienia czegoś, napisz among) us. Julia, my neighbour, is the person which (which jest dla rzeczy) I admire. We have been living in our neighbourhood for 10 years. I remember the first time when I met her. I was invited to a housewarming party. I thought that was weird (lepiej: I thought it to be weird - thought sth to be sth) , because (przedimek) strange woman (had) invited me to a (drugi raz party, przedimek określony) party. After (przedimek)party I realised that she was just a nice person who wanted to get to know other people. (nie rozumiem tego zdania)
Julia is 28 years old. The most noticeable things about her are her beautiful smile and big brown eyes which seems (masz na myśli oczy, więc:)) to be very friendly. She is very tall and skinny.
Julia is very helpful. She always helps me and even my friend when we don’t know what to do. She gives good advices (advice jest niepoliczalna) to us. We know that she can always listen to us. Julia is also a very reliable person. Once when I went on holidayS I couldn’t get (napisz bring/ take) my dog with me and then she offered that she was looking (zaoferowała, że się nim zaopiekuje: przyszły czas w przeszłości: forma przeszła dla will +czas) after it. She took care of my dog and it seems to liked Julia. (pies polubił Julię? napisz: it seemed that the dog liked/took to Julia - caly czas piszesz o przeszłości) She keeps (przedimek) open house so that everybody can drop in and spend time with her.
To Sum up, the person which (which jest dla rzeczy) I admire lives near to me and spends a lot of time with me. I think I can call Julia my best friend, because I always tell her about everything. She is like aN older sister for me and takes care of me.

???

jak mowimy o ludziach to 'who' albo 'whom'...The person whom I most admire..
aha jeszcze
ostatbie zdanie...my best friend, because I can always tell her everything (bez tego 'about')

W kontekscie j/w, tak. Moj argument jest ze "which" nie jest wylacznie dla rzeczy.

W kontekscie j/w moze byc tez 'that' albo nawet lepiej 'zero'.

>>Moj argument jest ze "which" nie jest wylacznie dla rzeczy.

Przeciez wiadomo, ale wiemy co Terri miala na mysli chyba. Dla askera to wystaczy.

tak dla przykladu:
[a policeman is asking the victim a question, showing him a CCTV snapshot]
Which did you think attacked you last night? = Which (one) of the blokes in the picture did you think attacked you last night?

Wydaje mi sie Fui nie chodzilo o 'which' jako interrogative determiner tylko o relative pronoun , no ale nie wiem

nie, fui raczej dziwil sie, ze komentarz do which byl taki, a nie inny, czyli mowiacy ogolnie o which, nie tylko w przypadku relative clauses, w ktorych to faktem jest, ze which nie odnosi sie do osob

Mi chodzilo o to co grudziu napisal: "which jest dla rzeczy", z czym sie nie zgadzam

>>nie tylko w przypadku relative clauses, w ktorych to faktem jest, ze which nie odnosi sie do osob

no oczywiscie moze sie odnosic tylko ty o tym nie wiesz jeszcze ( sentential realtive clauses)

oj cos ci sie z tymi sentential relative clauses porybalo :(

sentential rel.cl. odnoszą się, jak sama nazwa waksauje, do zdań, po których nastepują, nie do osób.

spot-on, mg :) I was thinking of the same explanation

Relative clauses sa podzielone na nominal, adnominal i sentential.
Te najbardziej znane i uzywane sa adnominal. Nominal maja what .
Gdzie bys zaliczyl takie zdania gdzie 'which' moze sie odnosic do osob jesli w nominal nie ma which a w adnominal nie mozemy uzyc 'which' do personal reference ?
Ja bym tam ich zaliczył

A moze mi sie i porypalo triche rzeczywiscie, moze byc w adnominal

Uwaga: student Savagerhino nie zaliczył relative clauses.
Sesja poprawkowa we wrześniu.

Pisałem o KONTEKŚCIE ASKERA. Są przypadki, w których which może odnosić się do animate things.

ok, ok :) Ja mialem na mysli takie uzycia , gdzie jest personal reference :

Cytat :

Which can have a personal noun as its antecedent when the relative is a
complement with the semantic role of characterization attribute :
"He imagined himself to be an artist, which he was not"

Relative pronoun as complement:
When the relative pronoun functions as nonprepositional complement in the
relative clause, the choice is limited to which for both personal and nonpersonal
antecedents, in both restrictive clauses and nonrestrictive
clauses :
He is a teetotaller, which I am not.

zgadza się, z tym że
1. zamiast rzeczownika osobowego może tam być nieosobowy albo w ogole przymiotnik
2. ciekawe jak wyglada takie uzycie which w restrictive clause. Masz jakis przyklad?

Wlasnie o to chodzi, ja nie bardzo chce zaliczyc to do adnominal clauses wlasnie, czy mam racje ?
Poszukam czy jest jakis przyklad ale tu chodzilo o uzycie 'which' z tym characterization attribute

skoro może wystepowac po przymiotnikach
he claimed to be kind to other, which he was not.
to trudno nazwac to adnominal.

czyli mam racje ? Znaczy nie chodzi mi o to ze mam racje tu czy tam tylko ze na wprost tego nigdzie nie zaliczyl nikt formalnie a chyba tzreba by było bo chyba to 'which' troche zachacza cale zdanie ?

na zdrowy rozum to jest miedzy adnominal i sentential, ale nie pamietam, jak to nazywali w ksiazkach, ktore znam.

No dobrze

p.s. Mg, moge zdawac troche wczesnie niz we wrezsniu, np w maju ?

przecież napisales "ja nie bardzo chce zaliczyc"
Coz, szykuje sie skreslenie ze skutkiem natychmiastowym.

Kiedy ja dam czekolade i troche whiskey , moze przyjma ( no i jak w sekretariacie bedzie kobieta to bede jej patrzyl prosto w oczy ...

no to probuj :-)

A jesli jej zagram jeszcze 'Dla Elizy'w jazz bisto na Pieknej jak bedzie pila margarita to nie moze mi odmowic. Ale pozniej moga byc problemy w zakresie "discontinuity between head and modifier":)