proszę o sprawdzenie;-)

hej. proszę o sprawdzenie i pomoc w poprawieniu błędów. nie jestem zbyt dobra z angielskiego i temat mi kompletnie nie podpasował no ale spróbowałam coś napisać;-) z góry dzięki!

Computers. People have a different sentence of on a subject(na temat) whether people substitute by robots it is good or bad idea. I think that this phenomenon has its own pluses and minuses. On the one hand it is good, because I think that robots are more productive than people. They can work actually nonstop in contrast with people and robots don’t feel pain . A chief needn’t pay a salary them. Only costs are the purchase of the equipment and his maintenance. Minuses are that(minusy to to, że...) less and less people will have a job if robots substitute them(jesli roboty beda ich zastepowac). It will increase the unemployment. It can have(?) fatal results. I think that people should study in their own spheres(fields?) and they should take up(zajmować się nimi?) them and they should find fulfilment professionally and robots should not replace them.

People have a different 'sentence' (wiem, ze po polsku 'zdanie' to sentence - ale tutaj to slowo nie pasuje. Lepiej uzyc 'opinion') on 'a' THE subject
whether 'people substitute by robots' (to substitute people by robots) 'it' (niepotrz) is good or A bad idea.
They can 'work actually' (actually work) nonstop in contrast 'with' TO people and robots don't feel pain . A chief needn't pay 'a salary them' (them a salary). THE only costs are the purchase of the equipment and 'his' ITS maintenance. THE minuses are that less and less people will have 'a job' (lepiej 'jobs' dlatego ze mowisz o people-l.mn) if 'robots substitute them' (they are substituted by robots). It will increase 'the' (bez 'the') unemployment. It can have fatal results. I think that
people should study in their own 'spheres' (lepiej fields) and they should take
'up them' (them up)(tu cos brakuje - moze ...should take up employment in them, so that) they should find fulfilment professionally. Robots should not replace 'them' (lepiej 'people').