kolejna rozprawka do sprawdzenia ...

Kolejna rozprawka do przeglądnięcia. Już późno tak więc pewnie będzie dużo błędów. Z góry dziękuję za pomoc :D

Money play big role in our lives, they changed course of history many times, especially in capitalist times and we can't change that, but problem is if they are still things that can't be buy or we only think that they can't be buy.
Many people think that things like love, friendship or respect can't be buy, and people can deserve on them only by behaviour and way of be. On the other hand situations like marriage of reason or respecting people only because they are rich , are nagation of previous opinion. But question is, that mariage or friendship based on money can be real or only fake ? Most people agree that marriage or friendship based on money are less resistant and oftenly they break down then normal relationship. Also this kind of relationship can finished very fast when partner get know that money just have ended. Despite that some of this fake relationship can change on real, for this reason that people can accustom to partner, but then that relation isn't still based on money but on real feelings.
In conclusion we can say that money can't give us a real relationship at bast it can give us a illusions of it.

Money 'play' (money jako 3os.l.poj to 'it' i trzeba czasown 3os.l.poj) A big role in our lives, 'they' (od kiedy money to 'they?) HAS changed THE course of history many times, especially in capitalist 'times' (lepiej uzyj societies) and we can't change that, but THE problem is if 'they are still things that can't be buy' (co?) (czy masz na mysli...there are still...)or we only think that they can't be 'buy' (buy-to kupic-prosze to popraw). (To zdanie jest za dlugie, zrob z tego 3 zdania)
Many people think that things like love, friendship or respect can't
be 'buy' (tutaj BOUGHT), and people can deserve 'on' (niepotr) 'them' (nie-money to niepol) only by behaviour and way of 'be' (dlaczego uzywasz 'be' w ten sposob-to jest zle-tutaj nawet nie wiem co chcesz przekazac).
On the other hand situations like marriage 'of' (dlaczego of?) reason or respecting people only because they are rich, are nagation of previous opinion (ale jaka jest ta 'previous opinion'?).
But THE question is, (dlaczego przecinek?) WHETHER 'that' (niepotr) marRiage or friendship based on money can be real or WHETHER IT IS only A fake? 'Most people agree' (na jakiej podstawie to piszesz? gdzie wyniki badan-tutaj generalizacja) that marriage or friendship based on money are less resistant and 'oftenly' 'OFTEN they break down' (zla kol slow - they break down more often than) 'then' THAN 'normal relationship' (musisz napisac co to jest 'normal'). Also this kind of relationship can BE finished very 'fast' QUICKLY when A partner getS TO know that money 'just have ended' (zla kol slow - has just finished).
Despite that some of thESE fake relationshipS can change 'on' (chyba FOR) real, for 'this' THE reason that people can GET accustomMED to A partner, but then that relationSHIP isn't still based on money but on real feelings.
In conclusion we can say that money can't give us a real relationship AND at 'bast' (to slowo nie istnieje) BEST it can give us aN illusion (albo give us illusions) of it.
(ode mnie ...Troche to nieprawda-mnostwo 'relationships' istnieje calkowicie wspaniale gdy jeden z partnerow jest bogaty)